. 2019 Jul 28;17(6):594–610. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12359

Table 2.

Linear regression coefficients (multiple R) and the associated p‐values calculated to test the influence of diagenetic indicators on U concentrations

	multiple R	p‐value
South China section
U concentration versus δ¹³C	.38	<.01
U concentration versus Mg/Ca (mol:mol)	.29	.04
U concentration versus Sr/Ca (ppm/w.t.%)	.21	.14
U concentration versus δ¹⁸O	.08	.57
U concentration versus Sr concentration	.25	.09
U concentration versus Mn concentration	.25	.08
U concentration versus Mn/Sr	.17	.23
U concentration versus Rb/Sr	.05	.74
U concentration versus Mo concentration	.60	<.01
Siberia section
U concentration versus δ¹³C	.24	.12
U concentration versus Mg/Ca (mol:mol)	.23	.15
U concentration versus Sr/Ca (ppm/w.t.%)	.58	<.01
U concentration versus δ¹⁸O	.30	.06
U concentration versus Sr concentration	.63	<.01
U concentration versus Mn concentration	.33	.03
U concentration versus Mn/Sr	.41	<.01
U concentration versus Rb/Sr	.46	<.01
U concentration versus Mo concentration	.05	<.01
Death Valley section
U concentration versus δ¹³C	.27	.26
U concentration versus Mg/Ca (mol:mol)	.16	.48
U concentration versus Sr/Ca (ppm/w.t.%)	.13	.58
U concentration versus δ¹⁸O	.11	.44
U concentration versus Sr concentration	.17	.47
U concentration versus Mn concentration	.14	.59
U concentration versus Mn/Sr	.06	.81
U concentration versus Rb/Sr	.26	.26
U concentration versus Th/U	.26	.26
U concentration versus Mo concentration	.34	.14

p‐value <.05 denotes the regression statistical analyses between two variables are statistically significant; p‐value >.05 denotes the regression statistical analyses between two variables are not statistically significant.