Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 28;21(5):1017–1022. doi: 10.1111/cid.12825

Table 3.

Frequencies and percentages (implant‐based) of plaque‐index scores (possible score 0‐3), calculus‐index scores (possible score 0‐1), gingival‐index scores (possible score 0‐3), bleeding‐index scores (possible score 0‐3) and mean value, SD and minimum‐maximum value of probing depth (in mm) at 1 month (T1), 1 year (T12), and 5 years (T60) after placement of the restoration

T1 T12 T60
Plaque‐index Score 0: 31 (100%)

Score 0: 28 (90.3%)

Score 1: 3 (9.7%)

Score 0: 27 (87.1%)

Score 1: 4 (12.9%)
Calculus‐index Score 0: 31 (100%) Score 0: 31 (100%) Score 0: 31 (100%)
Gingival‐index

Score 0: 30 (96.8%)

Score 1: 1 (3.2%)

Score 0: 29 (93.5%)

Score 1: 2 (6.5%)

Score 0: 29 (93.5%)

Score 1: 2 (6.5%)
Bleeding‐index

Score 0: 23 (74.2%)

Score 1: 7 (22.6%)

Score 2: 1 (3.2%)

Score 0: 21 (67.8%)

Score 1: 10 (32.2%)

Score 0: 21 (67.8%)

Score 1: 9 (29.0%)

Score 2: 1 (3.2%)
Probing depth in mm (sd), min‐max 2.4 (0.6), 1–4 2.5 (0.6), 2‐4 2.6 (0.7), 2‐5

Note: No significant differences (Paired samples t‐test) in probing depth between evaluation time points (T1‐T12: P = .374; T1‐T60: P = .147; T12‐T60: P = .403).