. 2018 Jun 19;29(4):846–862. doi: 10.1111/jora.12417

Table 5.

Bivariate Correlations Among Informants for Waves 1–6

	W1	W2	W3	W4	W5	W6
Support
Reporter differences
AM‐MA	.226_a	.347_b,c	.273_a,b	.367_c,d	.378_c,d	.446_d
AF‐FA	.292_a	.351_a,b	.373_a,b	.377_a,b	.434_b	.391_b
Parental differences
MA‐FA	.241_a	.243_a	.300_a,b	.311_a,b	.353_b	.368_b
AM‐AF	.590_b	.493_a	.624_b	.530_a,b	.590_b	.492_a
Control
Reporter differences
AM‐MA	.141_a	.192_a,b	.275_b	.236_a,b	.379_c	.435_c
AF‐FA	.256_a	.187_a	.306_a,b	.314_a,b	.396_b,c	.411_c
Parental differences
MA‐FA	.034^* _a	.167_b	.270_c	.276_c	.375_d	.404_d
AM‐AF	.680_a	.650_a	.689_a	.640_a	.668_a	.685_a

AM: adolescent report for mother; MA: mother report for adolescent; AF: adolescent report for father; FA: father report for adolescent. Correlations with same subscripts within each row do not differ statistically.

*All correlations, except for this, are significant, p < .001. N = 497.