Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 15;24(11):1301–1310. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13303

Table 5.

Estimates of absolute and relative inequalities in type 2 diabetes management, stratified by sex

  Screening Medication
Men Women Men Women
Overall
SPR (95% CI)* 11.00 9.9–12.3 11.3 10.2–12.4 12.8 8.2–19.1 13.1 9.3–17.9
Household consumption
SPR (95% CI)*
Quintile 1 (poorest) 4.98 3.34–7.14 4.53 3.10–6.38 0.00 3.93 0.36–14.53
Quintile 2 7.18 5.22–9.61 9.17 7.15–11.59 10.28 3.21–24.25 19.37 10.07–33.49
Quintile 3 9.56 7.25–12.38 11.06 8.76–13.77 15.61 2.00–48.60 7.78 2.07–20.02
Quintile 4 13.59 10.72–16.76 12.66 10.19–15.54 15.08 6.35–29.98 16.13 6.84–31.99
Quintile 5 (richest) 20.94 17.27–25.15 20.12 16.90–23.75 17.47 6.96–35.41 16.69 8.56–29.26
Rate difference 15.96 15.59 17.47 12.76
Rate ratio 4.20 4.44 n.a 4.25
RII (95% CI)§ 8.12 5.25–12.55 6.71 4.58–9.83 9.27 1.57–54.57 1.83 0.57–5.86

n.a, not applicable.

*Standardised prevalence rate per 100 persons with 95% CI, age‐standardised to the total population.

Difference between richest and poorest quintile.

Ratio between richest and poorest quintile.

§Relative index of inequality, adjusted to age.