Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;50(6):634–643. doi: 10.1111/age.12853

Table 4.

Inflation and mean squared error (MSE) of genomic prediction for 20 traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle based on five approaches using five‐fold cross‐validation

Trait b(y^,GEBV) MSE
GBLUP BayesA BayesB BayesCπ BayesR GBLUP BayesA BayesB BayesCπ BayesR
ADG 0.63 0.67 0.70 0.93 0.96 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.15
LW 0.84 0.85 0.83 1.08 1.04 45.48 47.16 46.21 46.51 46.54
CW 0.72 0.74 0.76 0.94 0.95 27.26 29.99 29.79 28.73 28.94
DP 0.87 0.88 0.91 0.65 0.88 2.34 2.40 2.41 2.54 2.48
LMP 0.28 0.31 0.27 0.47 0.43 2.44 2.49 2.47 2.42 2.46
ST 1.56 1.58 1.59 1.76 1.79 19.00 19.41 19.44 22.08 20.12
SR 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.85 0.88 1.42 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45
CR 0.59 0.61 0.62 0.70 0.76 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.56
TD 1.01 1.04 1.09 1.19 1.21 2.36 2.42 2.37 2.36 2.35
FS 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.49 0.49 0.53 0.49 0.48
BI 0.96 1.00 1.07 1.27 1.25 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.88 0.87
OU 0.83 0.84 0.87 0.92 0.94 0.18 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.18
ER 0.78 0.77 0.78 0.81 0.87 1.65 1.84 1.92 1.91 1.89
KN 0.67 0.67 0.77 0.78 0.79 1.65 1.64 2.12 1.75 1.96
ICO 0.70 0.72 0.74 0.90 0.85 1.10 1.11 1.45 1.12 1.35
HS 0.75 0.76 0.86 0.87 0.89 1.41 1.41 1.55 1.40 1.48
RMW 0.94 0.95 0.97 1.15 1.02 0.86 0.87 0.84 0.92 0.89
BFT 0.45 0.37 0.45 0.50 0.48 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.97
pH 1.98 1.95 2.08 1.33 1.32 1.71 1.71 1.75 1.72 1.74
SF 1.39 0.64 0.63 0.79 0.76 1.30 1.30 1.31 1.31 1.31

ADG, average daily gain; BFT, back fat thickness; CM, conical muscle; CR, chuck roll; CW, carcass weight; DP, dressing percentage; FS, fore shank; HS, hind shank; ICO, inside cap off; KN, knuckle; LMP, lean meat percentage; LW, live weight; OU, outside; pH, potential of hydrogen; RMW, retail meat weight; SF, shear force; SI, silverside; SR, Spencer roll; ST, striploin; TD, tenderloin.