Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;39(12):1054–1063. doi: 10.1002/pd.5539

Table 2.

Comparisons between Z‐scores of semilunar valve annulus and left ventricular outflow tract measurements at 1 y and last follow‐up

Comparisons Rho P Value Comparisons Rho P Value
18−22 wk
1 y FU Last FU
Z‐fPV vs Z‐AoV −0.18 .142 Z‐fPV vs Z‐oV −0.10 .370
Z‐fPV vs Z‐NAoR −0.27 .027 Z‐fPV vs Z‐NAoR −0.29 .009
Z‐fPV vs Z‐STjunction −0.09 .491 Z‐fPV vs Z‐STjunction 0.01 .949
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐AoV −0.35 .002 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐AoV −0.21 .062
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐NAoR −0.16 .171 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐NAoR −0.12 .338
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐STjunction −0.09 .501 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐STjunction −0.03 .794
26−30 wk
1 y FU Last FU
Z‐fPV vs Z‐AoV −0.31 .020 Z‐fPV vs Z‐AoV −0.32 .008
Z‐fPV vs Z‐NAoR −0.28 .035 Z‐fPV vs Z‐NAoR −0.49 <.001
Z‐fPV vs Z‐STjunction −0.20 .150 Z‐fPV vs Z‐STjunction −0.39 .019
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐AoV −0.31 .019 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐AoV −0.29 .016
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐NAoR −0.13 .333 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐NAoR −0.35 .003
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐STjunction −0.08 .574 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐STjunction −0.10 .441
32−36 wk
1 y FU Last FU
Z‐fPV vs Z‐AoV −0.24 .054 Z‐fPV vs Z‐AoV −0.27 .024
Z‐fPV vs Z‐NAoR −0.24 .063 Z‐fPV vs Z‐NAoR −0.28 .019
Z‐fPV vs Z‐STjunction −0.06 .658 Z‐fPV vs Z‐STjunction −0.11 .394
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐AoV −0.11 .410 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐AoV −0.24 .056
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐NAoR −0.21 .112 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐NAoR −0.17 .164
Z‐fAoV vs Z‐STjunction −0.17 .228 Z‐fAoV vs Z‐STjunction −0.02 .877

Note. Significant results are shown in bold (P < .05). Fetal Z‐scores based on Vigneswaran et al.21

Abbreviations: FU, follow‐up; Z‐AoV, Z‐score of neo‐aortic valve annulus diameter post arterial switch operation; Z‐fAoV, Z‐score of the fetal aortic valve annulus diameter; Z‐fPV, Z‐score of the fetal pulmonary valve annulus diameter; Z‐NAoR, Z‐score of the neo‐aortic root; Z‐STjunction, Z‐score of the sino‐tubular junction.