Table 2.
Number (%) of clubs in each region for which data was available from the different sources of data/evidence for the RE-AIM scoresheet compilation
| Source of evidence | Region 1 (n=22) FootyFirst+S | Region 2 (n=25) FootyFirst+NS | Region 3 (n=31) FootyFirst+S |
| FootyFirst survey | 17 (77) | 9 (36) | 31 (100) |
| FootyFirst interview | 11 (50) | 0 (0) | 8 (29) |
| FootyFirst-related active communication (telephone and email) | 21 (95) | 25 (100) | 28 (90) |
| FootyFirst resources | 20 (91) | 25 (100) | 26 (84) |
| FootyFirst-related meetings | 19 (86) | 3 (12) | 22 (71) |
| Footy-First related passive communication (Twitter, autotext) | 15 (68) | 0 (0) | 14 (45) |
| FootyFirst-related event (training, launch, expo or advisory group meeting) | 19 (86) | 0 (0) | 29 (94) |
| Weekly FootyFirst implementation data | 12 (56) | 0 (0) | 4 (13) |
| FootyFirst-related observation | 10 (45) | 0 (0) | 8 (26) |
| Research assistants’ notes and recall | 22 (100) | 25 (100) | 31 (100) |
| ‘Intention to implement FootyFirst’ form | 16 (73) | 2 (8) | 17 (55) |
FootyFirst+NS, FootyFirst without implementation support; FootyFirst+S, FootyFirst with implementation support; RE-AIM, Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance.