Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 24;25(6):480–486. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042579

Table 3.

Mean RE-AIM dimension-specific (range 0–2) and total RE-AIM (range 0–10) scores for all regions after 1 year of FootyFirst implementation

Reach Perceived Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance Total RE-AIM
Score 95% CI Score 95% CI Score 95% CI Score 95% CI Score 95% CI Score 95% CI
FootyFirst+S regions
 Region 1 (2012) 1.91 1.72 to 2.00 0.77 0.41 to 1.13 1.36 0.94 to 1.78 0.36 0.04 to 0.69 0.86 0.45 to 1.28 5.27 3.97 to 6.58
 Region 3 (2013) 1.86 1.66 to 2.00 0.73 0.34 to 1.12 1.05 0.60 to 1.49 0.09 0.00 to 0.22 0.45 0.10 to 0.81 4.18 3.06 to 5.30
FootyFirst+NS region
 Region 2 (2012) 1.36 1.13 to 1.59 0.16 0.01 to 0.31 0.24 0.00 to 0.51 0.00 0.00 to 0.00 0.20 0.00 to 0.44 1.92 1.21 to 2.63

FootyFirst+NS, FootyFirst without implementation support; FootyFirst+S, FootyFirst with implementation support; RE-AIM, Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance.