Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 31;98(12):2781–2792. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03815-7

Table 2.

Summary of treatment responses in the whole study population (intention to treat, N = 80)

Response After induction therapy At 3 months after ASCT Len maintenance 1 year after ASCT Len maintenance 2 years after ASCT Len maintenance 3 years after ASCT Best response at any time+
sCR (N (%)) 8 (10) 12 (15) 13 (16) 16 (20) 16 (20) 30 (38)
CR (N (%)) 4 (5) 6 (8) 9 (11) 7 (9) 5 (6) 8 (10)
VGPR (N (%)) 28 (35) 25 (31) 14 (18) 10 (13) 7 (9) 16 (20)
PR (N (%)) 28 (35) 10 (13) 5 (6) 1 (1) 1 (1) 17 (21)
SD (N (%)) 2 (3) 1 (1) 0 0 0 1 (1)
Cumulative PD (N (%)) 1 (1) 11 (14) 20 (25) 26 (33) 30 (38) -
Flow-MRD negative^ (N (%)) 23 (29) 28 (35) 21 (26) 18 (23) 12 (15) 42 (53)
PCR-MRD negative^ (N (%)) 4 (5) 8 (10) 7 (9) 8 (10) 3 (4) 22 (28)
Cumulative withdrawn* (N (%)) 9 (11) 15 (19) 19 (24) 20 (25) 21 (26) -

ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; CR, complete response; Len, lenalidomide; MRD, minimal residual disease; nCR, near complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; sCR, stringent complete response; SD, stable disease; VGPR, very good partial response

^Regardless of serological response

*Withdrawn at induction phase: 1 with other cancer < 5 years, 1 with neutropenia; at mobilization or ASCT before lenalidomide maintenance start, 1 with simultaneous other cancer, 1 with thrombosis, 1 not eligible to ASCT, 1 death, 1 liver toxicity, 1 infection toxicity, 1 with severe sepsis syndrome, 1 with comorbidities, 3 received allogeneic SCT, 1 psychiatric illness, 1 rash +response could not be evaluated due to early withdrawal for 7 patients and one patient progressed early during induction