Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;15(10):716–722. doi: 10.6026/97320630015716

Table 1. Effect of EECS and EETF and their poly herbal formulation on bodyweight.

Body weight (gms) (Mean± SEM) on
S. No Groups Treatment 1st day 7th day 14th day 21st day
1 Group-1 2% acacia, 10ml/kg b.w 172.58± 8.47 181.15± 6.71 168.76± 7.11 175.74± 7.06
2 Group-2 Alloxan (150mg/kg, i.p) 154.11± 5.29### 139.87± 11.74### 102.78± 9.87### 79.41±8.28###
3 Group-3 Alloxan (150mg/kg, i.p)and Glibenclamide (0.5 mg/kg, P.O) 164.25± 8.09 158.74± 11.78* 153.78± 12.9*** 146.47± 7.09***
4 Group-4 Alloxan (150mg/kg, i.p) ande EETF (100 mg/kg, p.o.), 155.65± 7.36 142.88± 9.48 126.97± 7.22* 84.65± 9.31**
5 Group-5 Alloxan (150mg/kg, i.p) and EECS (100 mg/kg, p.o.) 169.74± 12.74 133.44± 10.42* 124.74± 7.44* 91.78± 9.77**
6 Group-6 Alloxan (150mg/kg, i.p) and EETF + EECS (100 mg/kg, p.o.) 176.84± 7.99 148.47±9.47** 119.47± 10.24*** 137.88± 10.24***
All values were expressed as Mean ± S.E.M and n=6; # indicates P<0.05, ## indicates P<0.01, ### indicates P<0.001 when compared to normal group; * indicates P<0.05, ** indicates P<0.01,*** indicates P<0.001 when compared to alloxan induced group (One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test)