Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 3;6(6):ENEURO.0311-19.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0311-19.2019

Table 3.

Results of DAVID Bioinformatics analysis for the comparison between sham and acquisition groups

Functional annotation term summary* Enrichment score FDR (q value)
Cluster Median SD Lowest Highest
1 Postsynaptic membrane 13.96 5.88E-13 0.055 1.65E-20 0.18
2 Synapse 12.40 6.63E-12 0.041 1.65E-20 0.092
3 Ion transport 9.54 3.25E-07 4.75E-07 1.49E-07 1.05E-06
4 Mitochondrial inner membrane 7.44 0.0154 0.093 2.25E-12 0.19
5 Positive regulation of excitatory postsynaptic potential 5.23 0.0014 0.848 3.79E-04 1.47
6 Neuronal membrane-associated guanylate kinases 5.16 0.0163 0.224 4.25E-04 0.46
7 PDZ and SH3 domains 4.91 0.0121 19.78 1.44E-07 65.75
8 Ionotropic glutamate and NMDA receptors 4.86 0.0272 0.859 3.01E-04 1.50
9 AMPA glutamate receptor complex 4.42 0.0104 5.28 0.0018 9.15
10 Glutamatergic synapses 4.34 0.1636 25.26 1.44E-07 100.0
11 Guanylate-kinase-associated protein 4.25 1.0843 0.682 4.25E-04 1.26
*

See Extended Data Table 3-1 for detailed functional clustering annotation terms.