Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 16;109(1):197–206. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy233

TABLE 2.

Trabecular and cortical bone at the metaphyseal (3%) and diaphyseal (38%) tibia and metaphyseal (4%) and diaphyseal (50%) radius assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography from baseline to 12 mo postpartum in women receiving calcium supplementation or placebo during pregnancy1

Visit 1 (baseline) Visit 3 (36 wk of pregnancy) Visit 4 (4 mo postpartum) Visit 5 (12 mo postpartum)
Calcium (n = 32) Placebo (n = 32) Calcium (n = 26) Placebo (n = 27) Calcium (n = 22) Placebo (n = 23) Calcium (n = 15) Placebo (n = 15)
Tibial distal metaphyseal site (3%), g/cm3
 Total vBMD 291 ± 28 296 ± 38 288 ± 28 298 ± 39 287 ± 27 292 ± 40 296 ± 24 277 ± 31
 Trabecular vBMD 245 ± 28 253 ± 36 243 ± 27 255 ± 34 240 ± 24 251 ± 35 250 ± 202 236 ± 272
Tibial proximal diaphyseal site (38%), g/cm3
 Total BMD 922 ± 57 932 ± 62 924 ± 49 938 ± 54 920 ± 52 935 ± 69 913 ± 442 921 ± 792
 Cortical vBMD 1197 ± 22 1197 ± 15 1195 ± 20 1196 ± 16 1200 ± 17 1197 ± 18 1195 ± 182 1193 ± 112
Radial distal metaphyseal site (4%), g/cm3
 Total vBMD 386 ± 45 386 ± 52 378 ± 43 389 ± 49 381 ± 52 387 ± 62 365 ± 35 379 ± 39
 Trabecular vBMD 194 ± 38 192 ± 32 213 ± 37 219 ± 31 216 ± 37 212 ± 28 220 ± 49 202 ± 34
Radial proximal diaphyseal site (50%), g/cm3
 Total vBMD 1013 ± 69 1002 ± 76 1007 ± 77 1003 ± 81 1013 ± 73 996 ± 87 1029 ± 552 975 ± 1002
 Cortical vBMD 1209 ± 20 1205 ± 19 1199 ± 30 1206 ± 23 1206 ± 21 1204 ± 20 1214 ± 16 1196 ± 25
1

Values are means ± SDs for the n at each time point. Calcium: 1000-mg Ca supplement/d from 16 wk of gestation to delivery. Placebo: placebo daily from 16 wk of gestation to delivery. BMD, bone mineral density; vBMD, volumetric bone mineral density.

2

Group × time effects from baseline to 12 mo postpartum (visit 5) were observed for 2 variables (tibia diaphyseal cortical BMD: P = 0.015; radial diaphyseal total BMD: P = 0.029). Tibial metaphyseal trabecular BMD and diaphyseal total BMD trended (P < 0.10) toward significantly higher values in the calcium group compared with the placebo group by visit 5.