Table 2.

Associations between mindfulness meditation condition, time meditating, the linear slope, and their interactions predicting coping flexibility.

	Condition (Control = 0, Mindfulness =1)
	Main effects models			Interaction models
	b	SE	p	b	SE	p
Intercept	2.60*	(.06)	<0.001	2.60*	(.06)	<0.001
Baseline stress	−0.20	(.06)	0.001	−0.20	(.06)	0.001
Linear slope	0.05	(.02)	0.026	0.00	(.03)	0.996
Condition	0.12	(.08)	0.131	0.13	(.08)	0.116
Linear slope * condition	---	---	---	0.09	(.04)	0.045
Pseudo R2				1.37%

	Time meditating (in hours)
	Main effects models			Interaction models
	b	SE	p	b	SE	p
Intercept	2.58*	(.05)	<.001	2.58*	(.05)	<.001
Baseline stress	−0.20	(.05)	<.001	−0.20	(.05)	<.001
Linear slope	0.05	(.02)	0.027	−0.01	(.03)	0.726
Time meditating	0.06	(.02)	0.016	0.06	(.02)	0.015
Linear slope * time meditating	---	---	---	0.04	(.01)	0.003
Pseudo R2				01%

Note. Each set of lines (meditation experience, linear slope, med. experience x linear slope) represent separate analyses.

^*Variable exhibited, and was modeled with, a significant random effect. Pseudo R² were calculated with baseline stress as null models, so that in each model, Pseudo R² represents the additional percent of residual variance accounted for once condition or time meditating and slopes are entered into models.