Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 27;2019:9302636. doi: 10.1155/2019/9302636

Table 5.

Association analysis between BGLAP HindIII and T2DM development among obese and nonobese individuals.

Regression model1 P c ORc (95% CI) P c int P a ORa (95% CI) P a int P b P intb
Dominant 0.011 0.387 (0.186-0.806) 0.029 0.018 0.399 (0.187-0.852) 0.046 0.072 0.184
0.889 1.036 (0.634-1.693) 0.969 1.01 (0.609-1.675) 1

Recessive 0.221 4.179 (0.424-41.224) 0.419 0.193 4.868 (0.449-52.757) 0.402 0.772 1
0.338 1.525 (0.643-3.616) 0.277 1.641 (0.672-4.01) 1

Overdominant 0.003 0.305 (0.141-0.661) 0.023 0.004 0.308 (0.138-0.687) 0.038 0.016 0.152
0.692 0.9 (0.534-1.516) 0.575 0.858 (0.501-1.467) 1

Additive CT vs. TT 0.004 0.318 (0.146-0.693) 0.024 0.006 0.319 (0.142-0.717) 0.037 0.024 0.148
0.828 0.943 (0.553-1.605) 0.722 0.905 (0.522-1.568) 1
CC vs. TT 0.37 2.864 (0.286-28.629) 0.605 0.293 3.581 (0.332-38.672) 0.527 1 1
0.372 1.495 (0.619-3.61) 0.331 1.574 (0.631-3.928) 1

1Upper row represents the results for individuals with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and lower row for those with BMI < 30 kg/m2. Pc: crude P value; Pcint: crude P value for interactive term; Pa: P value adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and arterial hypertension presence; Paint: P value adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and arterial hypertension presence for interaction term; Pb: P value adjusted for Bonferroni correction; Pintb: P value adjusted for Bonferroni correction for interaction term.