Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 27;2019:9302636. doi: 10.1155/2019/9302636

Table 6.

Association analysis between BGLAP HindIII and T2DM development among males and females.

Regression model1 P c ORc (95% CI) P c int P a ORa (95% CI) P a int P b P intb
Dominant 0.406 0.794 (0.461-1.368) 0.705 0.511 0.829 (0.474-1.449) 0.594 1 1
0.216 0.678 (0.366-1.254) 0.198 0.658 (0.348-1.245) 0.792

Recessive 0.734 1.208 (0.406-3.596) 0.509 0.491 1.776 (0.336-9.405) 0.499 1 1
0.227 2.079 (0.634-6.822) 0.128 2.63 (0.756-9.147) 0.512

Overdominant 0.304 0.741 (0.419-1.312) 0.428 0.313 0.739 (0.411-1.33) 0.338 1 1
0.053 0.521 (0.269-1.008) 0.033 0.476 (0.241-0.941) 0.132

Additive
 CT vs. TT 0.324 0.747 (0.419-1.333) 0.495 0.365 0.759 (0.418-1.379) 0.387 1 1
0.08 0.549 (0.281-1.073) 0.055 0.506 (0.252-1.014) 0.22
 CC vs. TT 0.871 1.096 (0.363-3.314) 0.596 0.556 1.409 (0.45-4.412) 0.555 1 1
0.385 1.708 (0.511-5.711) 0.187 2.351 (0.66-8.377) 0.748

1Upper row represents the results for males and lower row for females. Pc: crude P value; Pcint: crude P value for interactive term; Pa: P value adjusted for age, sex, smoking and arterial hypertension; Paint: P value adjusted for age, sex, smoking and arterial hypertension for interaction term; Pb: P value adjusted for Bonferroni correction; Pintb: P value adjusted for Bonferroni correction for interaction term.