Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Oct 26;120:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.10.017

Table 4.

Results of generalized estimating equation predicting likelihood of binge-eating episodes using GNG food-related commission errors, including the presence of compensatory behavior (group) as moderator

95% CI
B SE Lower Upper Wald χ2 p
Intercept −1.05 1.15 −3.31 1.21 0.83 0.362
BMI −0.02 0.02 −0.06 0.03 0.48 0.489
Age <0.01 0.02 −0.04 0.03 0.05 0.827
Group −0.12 0.63 −1.35 1.12 0.03 0.855
NA between 0.06 0.05 −0.04 0.17 1.46 0.227
GNG between (food) 4.05 2.69 −1.23 9.33 2.26 0.133
Momentary NA 0.05 0.05 −0.03 0.14 1.44 0.230
Daily GNG (food) −0.24 1.20 −2.60 2.11 0.04 0.839
Group X momentary NA 0.03 0.08 −0.12 0.18 0.11 0.736
Group X daily GNG (food) −0.05 2.95 −5.83 5.73 0.00 0.987
Momentary NA X daily GNG (food) −0.04 0.27 −0.56 0.49 0.02 0.895
Group X momentary NA X daily GNG (food) 2.46 1.22 0.07 4.86 4.07 0.044

Note. BMI=body mass index; NA=negative affect; GNG=Go/No-go food-related commission errors. Between-person effects were grand-mean centered. Within-person effects were person-mean centered, such that within-person NA reflects momentary fluctuations, and within-person GNG reflects daily fluctuations. Within-person momentary NA was lagged from the previous signal. Group was coded such that the reference category is the “no compensatory behavior” group.