Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 23;45(2):266–275. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0527-0

Table 1.

No differences were observed between risk or delay groups in omissions or choice latency for large or small reward in either task

Risk-taking group comparison Block × Risk-taking group interaction Impulsivity group comparison Block ×  Impulsivity group interaction
Omissions t(17) = 0.142 F(4,68) = 1.040 t(17) = 0.862 F(4,68) = 1.279
p = 0.889 p = 0.393 p = 0.401 p = 0.277
Large reward choice latency t(17) = 1.666 N/A t(17) = .529 N/A
p = 0.114 p = 0.604
Small reward choice latency t(17) = 1.470 N/A t(17) = 0.082 N/A
p = 0.160 p = 0.936

There were several blocks with choice of only one type of reward, which prevented assessment of group× block interactions for latency measures for large or small reward choice