Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 9;9:18639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54867-8

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison of specific components of cognitive performance between osteoarthritis cohort in TILDA WAVE1 (or NACC) and age/gender matched controls.

Controlled parameter (confounder) OA CONT Compared parameter OA CONT p-value
Males (TILDA) 0.26 0.28 Attrition (TILDA) 0.15 0.18 0.024
Age (TILDA) 69.9 69.9 MMSE average (TILDA) 28.1 27.8 0.009
Income (TILDA) 2.97 2.93 MMSE average max (NACC) 28.55 27.12 3.8 × 10−62

Education

(NACC)

15.8 16.3 MMSE average min (NACC) 26.12 24.12 7.8 × 10−60
Education (TILDA) 3.59 3.48 Cognitive Risk (TILDA) 0.38 0.51 0.002
Stroke (TILDA) 0.018 0.019 Poor short-term recall (TILDA) 0.137 0.192 0.005
Somatic Risk (TILDA) 0.36 0.33 Poor long-term recall (TILDA) 0.07 0.101 0.057
Age at baseline (NACC) 77.2 71.8 Educational underperformance (NACC) 0.076 0.057 0.066
Males (NACC) 0.37 0.37 Advanced degrees (NACC) 2.64 2.82 0.1

Stroke

(NACC)

0.043 0.029 Dementia in the baseline (NACC) 0.14 0.29 3.8 × 10−109
Somatic risk (NACC) 2.85 2.02 Dementia in the end of follow up (NACC) 0.24 0.40 4.7 × 10−95

In TILDA, osteoarthritis cohort (OA, N = 820) and non-arthritic controls (CONT, N = 2300) were normalized by age, gender and somatic disease risk. Somatic comorbidity panel (Somatic Risk) included open-heart surgery, heart attack, angioplasty and stent installation, congestive heart failure, cardio-pulmonary deficiency that requires oxygen supply, cancer, stroke and diabetes. Income levels were provided as a strata of population rank.

The compared parameters in TILDA include: Attrition – fraction of patients not re-appearing in WAVE2 of TILDA after being present in WAVE1, MMSE average – is average score between WAVE1-WAVE3, Educational under-performance – completion of only elementary school, Cognitive risk – the sum of fractions for low readings of MOCA (<20), MMSE (<20), poor short and long term recalls, poor visual recognition and reasoning, high delays in performing test assignments. Recall tests were conducted according to MOCA methodology.

The compared parameters in NACC Version 3 (OA, N = 8525, CONT, N = 5250) included dementia fraction, MMSE at the beginning and the end of follow up (MMSE MAX and MMSE MIN), educational underperformance (average years of underperformance per a patient) and advanced degree presence (average years of advanced education per a patient). Educational underperformance was defined in NACC as <9 years of schooling, advanced degree as >18 years of schooling, stroke and dementia rates in NACC are provided as fractions, somatic risk as number of comorbidities per a patient in the cohort.