Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;8(12):2058460119880315. doi: 10.1177/2058460119880315

Table 3.

Logistic regression, results.


Computer-only reading*

High level of trust in computer to determine frequency

High level of trust in computer to determine need of MRI
Predictor OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
What is your understanding of new technology such as computers, mobile phones and the Internet?
 High (Likert scale 3 and 4) vs. Low (Likert scale 1 and 2) 1.547 1.276–1.876 1.747 1.451–2.102 1.755 1.414–2.178
What is your highest level of completed education?
 High (more than 12 years) vs. Low (up to 12 years) 1.655 1.168–2.344 1.606 1.171–2.202 1.577 1.107–2.247
How old are you?
 55–64 vs. 40–54, years 0.948 0.749–1.199 0.739 0.585–0.935 0.809 0.612–1.070
 ≥65 vs. 40–54, years 1.030 0.839–1.265 0.884 0.718–1.088 0.958 0.744–1.232

*Based on Q8, Given the computer is at least as good as the average physician, what would you prefer?

Determined by Likert scores 3 and 4 to Q10, How well would you trust a computer to determine frequency of screening mammograms?

Determined by Likert scores 3 and 4 to Q14, How well would you trust a decision of a need for MRI determined by a computer?