Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2019 Jul 17;88(1):237–241. doi: 10.1002/prot.25771

Table 1.

Structure statistics for CGL2372 from C. glutamicum

Conformationally-restricting constraintsa
NOE-based distance constraints
 Total 1571
 Intra-residue (i=j) 380
 Sequential (|i-j|=1) 489
 Medium-range (1<|i-j|<5) 238
 Long-range (|i-j|≥5) 464
 NOE constraints per restrained residueb 10.1
Hydrogen bond constraints
 Long-range (|i-j |≥5)/total 62/108
Dihedral angle constraints 214
 Total number of restricting constraintsb 1893
 Total number of restricting constraints per restrained residueb 12.1
 Restricting long-range constraints per restrained residueb 3.4
Number of structures used 20
Residue constraint violationsa, c
 Distance violations per structure
  0.1–0.2Å 7.2
  0.2–0.5 Å 1.4
  >0.5Å 0
  RMS of distance violation/constraint (Å) 0.01
  Maximum distance violation (Å)d 0.42
 Dihedral angle violations per structure
  1–10° 17.8
  >10° 0
  Average RMS dihedral angle violation/constraint (degree) 0.80
  Maximum dihedral angle violation (degree)d 8.10
RMSD Valuese
 Backbone/Heavy atoms (Å) 1.3/1.8
Ramachandran plot summary from Richardson’s lab
 Most favored regions (%) 96.0
 Allowed regions (%) 4
 Disallowed regions (%) 0.0
Structure quality Factors (mean/Z-score)f
 Verify3D 0.27/−3.05
 Prosall (-ve) 0.33/−1.32
 Procheck G-factore (φ-Ψ) −0.35/−1.06
 Procheck G-factore (all dihedral angles) −0.27/−1.60
 Molprobity clash score 12.18/−0.56
RPF Scoresg
 Recall/Precision 0.99/0.89
 F-measure/DP-score 0.93/0.77
a

Calculated using PSVS 1.5 program. Residues (1–163) were analyzed.

b

There are 156 residues with conformationally restricting constraints.

c

Calculated for all constraints for the given residues, using sum over r–6.

d

Largest constraint violation among all the reported structures

e

Ordered residues ranges (with the sum of ϕ and ψ order parameters >1.8): 6–24, 36–46, 48–55, 57–75, 78–84, 88–111, 114–121, and 124–156.

f

With respect to mean and standard deviation for a set of 252 X-ray structures < 500 residues, of resolution ≤ 1.80 Å, R-factor ≤ 0.25 and R-free ≤ 0.28; a positive value indicates a ‘better’ score.

g

RPF scores reflected the goodness-of-fit of the final ensemble of structures including disordered residues to the NMR data.