Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;13:93. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00093

Table 7.

Methods of delivering Cre for cell-type targeting, labeling, and manipulation.

Method of Cre delivery
Targeted knock-in Cre mouse line Transgenic Cre mouse line (not generated by homologous recombination) Cre via AAV
Advantages • Specific and reliable by genetic targeting to the locus of interest (higher certainty that driver activity will reflect the endogenous expression of the gene of interest) • Cheap and easy to produce mouse lines • Stable over time
• Comprehensive with Cre mouse lines • Lower Cre expression than AAV • Spatial control: can restrict delivery to a particular region
• Sparse if using CreER by adjusting tamoxifen dose • Can be delivered broadly by systemic (e.g., tail vein or retro-orbital) injection
• Can combine with viral strategies to achieve spatial control or very strong expression
• Lower Cre expression than AAV
Disadvantages • Time-consuming and costly to produce and maintain mouse lines • Does not necessarily recapitulate the endogenous gene’s expression • Expression gradients from injection site(s)
• Genetic silencing in mouse lines can affect Cre expression • AAV vectors increase interleukin levels in the animal
• Sexual dimorphism can arise that does not reflect the gene’s native expression profile • High levels of Cre protein exhibit cell toxicity
• Transgenic animals can lose specificity over time