Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 25;180(2):215–222. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5193

Table 2. Association of Continuity of the Weighted Mean Schedules of Hospitalists Providing Care for Patients With Outcomes of Hospitalization by Quartilea.

Outcomeb Quartile of Weighted Average of Hospitalist Schedulesa
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Admissions, No. 29 068 28 967 28 721 28 291
30-d Mortality
Unadjusted rate, No. (%) 2101 (7.23) 1965 (6.85) 1905 (6.63) 1831 (6.47)
aOR (95% CI) 1 [Reference] 0.92 (0.85-0.98) 0.90 (0.83-0.98) 0.88 (0.81-0.95)
30-d Readmission
Unadjusted rate, No. (%) 4830 (16.62) 4747 (16.54) 4746 (16.52) 4701 (16.61)
HR (95% CI) 1 [Reference] 0.97 (0.93-1.01) 0.96 (0.91-1.01) 0.94 (0.90-0.99)
Discharged home
Unadjusted rate, No. (%) 12 778 (43.95) 12 582 (43.84) 12 658 (44.07) 13 154 (46.50)
aOR (95% CI) 1 [Reference] 1.05 (1.01-1.09) 1.03 (0.99-1.08) 1.08 (1.03-1.13)

Abbreviations: E&M, evaluation and management; HR, hazard ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio.

a

The schedule continuity of hospitalists was categorized as the percentage of their working days in the year of the admission that were part of a block of at least 7 consecutive working days. Each admission was then assigned a weighted mean hospitalist schedule, which was the mean of the continuity of each hospitalist providing care during that admission, weighted by the number of days each hospitalist submitted an E&M claim.

b

Adjusted odds ratios for 30-day mortality and discharge home were derived from a conditional logistic regression model, and HRs for 30-day readmissions were derived from a conditional Cox proportional hazard model, with death as a competing risk.