Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 25;9(12):10626–10639. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04214

Table 1. Fit Results the EXAFS Spectra of Pt/Al2O3 Samples Prepared under Different Conditionsa.

  Pt–O
Pt–Pt
Pt–Al
sample CNPt–O R (Å) σ22) CNPt–Pt R (Å) σ22) CNPt–Al R (Å) σ22)
Pt foil       12 2.77        
PtO2 6 1.99              
0.2Pt/Al2O3-SAb 6.2 ± 0.9 2.00 ± 0.01 0.003 ± 0.002       3 ± 2 2.92 ± 0.05 0.01
0.2Pt/Al2O3-200H2b 5.7 ± 0.9 1.99 ± 0.01 0.002 ± 0.002       2 ± 1 2.90 ± 0.07 0.01
0.2Pt/Al2O3-450H2b 3.0 ± 0.6 2.01 ± 0.01 0.003 ± 0.003 3 ± 1 2.76 ± 0.03 0.01      
0.2Pt/Al2O3-200H2-in situc 2.0 ± 0.5 1.99 ± 0.01 0.003 ± 0.003 5 ± 2 2.75 ± 0.02 0.009 ± 0.004      
0.2Pt/Al2O3-450H2-in situc 2 ± 1 2.01 ± 0.04 0.01 ± 0.02 7 ± 2 2.72 ± 0.01 0.009 ± 0.003      
a

ΔE0 = 9, Rfactor = 0.7. To decrease the number of parameters, the Debye–Waller (σ2) was kept free but the same for all paths with exception of the second shell contribution in the Pt/Al2O3 samples measured directly. In this case, it was fixed to 0.01.

b

The sample was directly measured by XAS without any treatment.

c

The sample was reduced by H2 at a given temperature before the XAS measurement.