Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;2(12):e1916641. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16641

Table 3. Estimated 20-Year Change in Cognitive Function by Tertile of Diet Pattern.

Change or Model Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3 P Value for Trenda
Western Diet Score
Participants, No. 4553 4541 4494
Change in z score −1.04 (−1.09 to −0.99) −0.97 (−1.02 to −0.92) −0.91 (−0.98 to −0.85) <.001
Model 1b,c [Reference] 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.08) 0.04 (−0.02 to 0.10) .17
Model 2b,d [Reference] 0.03 (−0.02 to 0.07) 0.03 (−0.03 to 0.08) .37
Prudent Diet Score
Participants, No. 4541 4536 4511
Change in z score −0.92 (−0.97 to −0.87) −0.98 (−1.04 to −0.93) −1.02 (−1.08 to −0.96) <.001
Model 1b,c [Reference] −0.01 (−0.06 to 0.04) −0.03 (−0.08 to 0.02) .24
Model 2b,d [Reference] −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.04) −0.01 (−0.06 to 0.04) .60
a

A linear trend was tested across the dietary tertiles using the median score of each tertile modeled as a continuous variable.

b

Difference of changes in z score compared with the first tertile.

c

Model 1 adjusted for age, age squared, sex, education, race–field center, and total calories.

d

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 and apolipoprotein E ε4 status, alcohol use history, smoking history, activity level, body mass index, total cholesterol, prevalent coronary heart disease, and history of hypertension, diabetes, and stroke.