Table 3.
HDAC8 | kcat/KM (M−1s−1) | KM (μM) | kcat (s−1) | kcat/KM Ratio (WT/S39E) | koff (min−1) | koff Ratio (S39E/WT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fe(II)-S39E | 440 ± 60 | 170 ± 30 | 0.077 ± 0.005 | 6 ± 2 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 9 ± 1 |
Fe(II)-WT | 2800 ± 700 | 90 ± 30 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.055 ± 0.005 | ||
Zn(II)-S39E | 26 ± 3 | > 400b | > 0.05b | 37 ± 6 | 0.57 ± 0.07 | 14 ± 3 |
Zn(II)-WT | 950 ± 96 | 1200 ± 300 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.040 ± 0.006 |
Values for kcat/KM, KM, and kcat were obtained by fitting the Michaelis-Menten equation (Equation 1) to the dependence of the initial rates of deacetylation on the substrate concentration catalyzed by Zn(II)- and Fe(II)-constituted S39E and wild-type HDAC8 as measured using the FdL assay. Enzyme concentration was 0.5–1 μM and substrate concentration was varied from 10–1000 μM. Values for koff were determined by fitting a single exponential (Equation 2) to the time-dependent decrease in activity upon incubation with 1 mM EDTA. Standard errors for kcat/KM, KM, kcat, and koff values were calculated using GraphPad Prism analysis. Error for kcat/KM and koff ratios were calculated using the propagation of uncertainty equation.40
Little curvature was observed in the dependence of activity on substrate concentration so that KM and kcat values are poorly defined by this data set. The necessity for excessively high enzyme and substrate concentrations preclude the accurate determination of these parameters, individually.