Stangel‐Wojcikiewicz 2008.
Methods | Design: RCT | |
Participants | 108 women Age 34‐78 years Inclusion criteria: urodynamically diagnosed GSI (USI) Exclusion criteria: OAB, DO, ISD (Valsalva leak point pressure < 65 cm water, MUCP < 20 cm water); prolapse grade 3 or 4, diabetes, neurological disorders, any contraindication to laparoscopic or open surgery |
|
Interventions | Group I (n = 51): LC Group II (n = 57): OC |
|
Outcomes | Stress test after surgery Operating time (mean min) Postoperative length of stay (mean h) Blood loss (mean mL) Urine retention Bladder perforation |
|
Notes | Other adverse effects in Group II: wound infection, retropubic haematoma, dyspareunia, thrombophlebitis Follow‐up: 18 months This trial is a conference abstract with little detail reported. Trial author emailed for more data |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not possible |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No dropouts |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Other bias | Unclear risk | This trial is a conference abstract with little detail reported |