Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 10;2019(12):CD002239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub4

Stangel‐Wojcikiewicz 2008.

Methods Design: RCT
Participants 108 women
Age 34‐78 years
Inclusion criteria: urodynamically diagnosed GSI (USI)
Exclusion criteria: OAB, DO, ISD (Valsalva leak point pressure < 65 cm water, MUCP < 20 cm water); prolapse grade 3 or 4, diabetes, neurological disorders, any contraindication to laparoscopic or open surgery
Interventions Group I (n = 51): LC
Group II (n = 57): OC
Outcomes Stress test after surgery
Operating time (mean min)
Postoperative length of stay (mean h)
Blood loss (mean mL)
Urine retention
Bladder perforation
Notes Other adverse effects in Group II: wound infection, retropubic haematoma, dyspareunia, thrombophlebitis
Follow‐up: 18 months
This trial is a conference abstract with little detail reported. Trial author emailed for more data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information
Other bias Unclear risk This trial is a conference abstract with little detail reported