Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;8:e51184. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51184

Figure 6. Dynamics of the effect of rIPS alpha HD-tACS stimulation on spatial, attend-left trials, comparing Sham and Stimulation sessions.

Figure 6.

Performance is consistently poorer for alpha stimulation than for sham stimulation throughout the course of stimulation; however, performance in the sessions is indistinguishable once stimulation ends. Trials within both the ‘stimulation’ block and post-stimulation block were divided into four sub-blocks each. Baseline-corrected performance and the standard error of the mean across subjects are shown for the Sham and the Stimulation sessions (dashed and solid lines, respectively). Data from the ‘true’ stimulation sub-blocks are shown in red (the first four sub-blocks of the Stimulation session); no-stimulation sub-blocks are shown in gray (all sub-blocks of the Sham session, as well as the final four sub-blocks of the Stimulation session).