Table 4.

Adjusted odds ratios from separate multiple logistic regressions of hospital overall rating regressed on type of care coordination strategy with and without state fixed effects, controlling for county and hospital characteristics ^a,b

	Model #1 (without state fixed effects)			Model #2 (with state fixed effects) c
Care Coordination Strategies	AOR	p-value	95% CI	AOR	p-value	95% CI
Predictive Analytics	1.05	0.795	0.71–1.57	1.00	0.986	0.65–1.55
Medication Reconciliation	1.99	0.040*	1.03–3.86	1.43	0.347	0.68–2.98
Hospitalists	1.09	0.792	0.56–2.14	1.06	0.858	0.52–2.18
Visit Summaries	1.50	0.025*	1.05–2.14	1.01	0.975	0.68–1.49
Outreach after Discharge	1.72	0.005**	1.17–2.50	1.64	0.024*	1.07–2.53
Home Visits	1.08	0.701	0.74–1.56	1.00	0.993	0.67–1.51
Prospective Patient Management	0.97	0.853	0.67–1.39	0.94	0.193	0.63–1.41
Discharge Care Plans	1.46	0.044*	1.01–2.12	1.35	0.164	0.89–2.05
Outpatient Follow-up	1.38	0.073	0.97–1.98	1.30	0.194	0.88–1.92
Chronic Care Management	1.31	0.142	0.91–1.87	1.15	0.499	0.77–1.71
Disease Management Programs	1.48	0.030*	1.04–2.10	1.28	0.208	0.87–1.89
Nurse Case Manager	1.18	0.356	0.83–1.70	1.11	0.602	0.75–1.66

^a.*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001

^b.Table only displays adjusted odds ratios for independent variables. Covariates included rural location, medical school affiliation, system affiliation, ownership status, size, safety-net status, the number of full-time equivalent registered nurses per 1,000 patient-days, the percentage of discharges reimbursed by Medicare, the percentage of county residents living below the poverty line, and the percentage of county residents that are Black.

^c.Eleven hospitals omitted because all hospitals participating in AHA Care Systems and Payment Survey received a high or low-rating.