Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;105(6):1182–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.008

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Power Comparison of SPAGE, CML, and EB Tests

Empirical powers were estimated based on 105 simulated variants with βG=0 and βG×E0. From top to bottom, the plots show empirical powers when testing variants with MAFs of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.3. From left to right, the plots consider case-control ratios of 25,000:25,000 (balanced), 5,000:45,000 (moderately unbalanced), and 500:49,500 (unbalanced). p values of CML (constrained maximum likelihood) and EB (empirical Bayes) were calculated via an R package CGEN. Round points are for powers at α=5×105 and triangle points are for powers at α=5×108.