Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 10;14:424. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1490-5

Table 2.

Kinematic and kinetic differences between DL and NDL (mean ± S.D.)

Collegiate athletes P valueb Recreational athletes P valuec
DL NDL DL NDL
Knee flexion angle at IC (deg.) 33.0 ± 8.4 35.6 ± 8.3 0.005 35.5 ± 9.4 35.3 ± 11.2 0.868
Peak knee flexion angle at IC (deg.) 107 ± 12.9 109 ± 12.6 0.127 97.1 ± 12.6d 96.8 ± 13.0d 0.791
Knee abduction angle at IC (deg.) − 2.1 ± 8.5 − 3.9 ± 6.8 0.143 − 4.8 ± 4.8 2.3 ± 4.9e 0.002
Peak knee abduction angle (deg.) 5.4 ± 11.8 1.5 ± 10.4 0.006 1.3 ± 7.2 6.3 ± 5.4 0.038
Knee internal rotation angle at IC (deg.) − 7.6 ± 10.4 − 9.1 ± 9.1 0.400 − 12.4 ± 8.7 10.3 ± 8.2 < 0.001
Peak knee internal rotation angle (deg.) 4.4 ± 6.8 5.5 ± 6.7 0.557 0.0067 ± 7.0d 11.8 ± 5.4e < 0.001
vGRF within 40 ms from IC (N) 1236 ± 629 1261 ± 366 0.827 1078 ± 314 1084 ± 445 0.953
PKFM within 40 ms from IC (Nm/kg) 1.69 ± 0.57 2.71 ± 0.88 < 0.001 1.67 ± 0.49 2.08 ± 0.87d 0.068
PKABDM within 40 ms from IC (Nm/kg) 0.36 ± 0.31 0.21 ± 0.36 0.827 0.17 ± 0.24d 0.38 ± 0.30 0.009
PKIRM within 40 ms from IC (Nm/kg) 0.16 ± 0.16 0.36 ± 0.39 0.675 0.22 ± 0.15 0.36 ± 0.39 0.175

bValues obtained using the two-tailed paired t test in collegiate athletes

cValues obtained using the two-tailed paired t test in recreational athletes

dValues were significantly larger in collegiate athletes than in recreational athletes using the two-tailed unpaired t test

eValues were significantly larger in recreational athletes than in collegiate athletes using the two-tailed unpaired t test