Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;10:2700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02700

TABLE 6.

Effects for path model: males.

Relationship Model 1
Model 2
Effect and Sig
CI
Effect and Sig
CI
β p Lower Upper β p Lower Upper
PBC → Intention 0.518 ∗∗∗ 0.507 ∗∗∗
Skill → Intention 0.245 0.006∗∗ 0.228 ∗∗∗
SubNorm → Intention 0.128 0.043 0.103 0.053
PBC → RiskProp → Intention 0.001 0.623 –0.010 0.024 0.001 0.650 –0.010 0.024
Skill → RiskProp → Intention 0.006 0.371 –0.010 0.061 0.006 0.348 –0.010 0.061
PBC → Motives → Intention 0.029 0.046 0.000 0.084 0.002 0.875 –0.029 0.041
Skill → Motives → Intention 0.033 0.056 –0.001 0.096 0.002 0.884 –0.044 0.038
SubNorm → Motives → Intention –0.002 0.717 –0.036 0.022 0.000 0.684 –0.026 0.013
PBC → Motives → RiskProp 0.034 0.019 0.005 0.095 0.028 0.018 0.004 0.084
Skill → Motives → RiskProp 0.039 0.035 0.003 0.101 0.031 0.036 0.002 0.089
Motives → RiskProp → Intention 0.009 0.356 –0.016 0.058 0.009 0.285 –0.015 0.056
PBC → Motives → RiskProp → Intention 0.002 0.263 –0.002 0.013 0.002 0.187 –0.001 0.012
Skill → Motives → RiskProp → Intention 0.002 0.320 –0.003 0.016 0.002 0.262 –0.002 0.013

β– Standardized estimates; ∗∗∗p = 0.001 or less; p is significant at the < 0.05 value.∗∗p < 0.01; p < 0.05. Indirect effects: Bootstrapping: 2000 iterations and 0.95 bias–corrected; Direct effects: Maximum Likelihood Estimation.