Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 23;42(3):400–405. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1444

Table 1.

Hazard ratios for development of retinopathy and microalbuminuria outcomes according to TIR

Retinopathy outcome
Microalbuminuria outcome
TIR N N (%) with outcome Unadjusted HR (95% CI)* Adjusted HR (95% CI)† N N (%) with outcome Unadjusted HR (95% CI)* Adjusted HR (95% CI)†
Overall
 ≥50% 466 36 (8) 1.00 1.00 412 10 (2) 1.00 1.00
 40 to <50% 319 32 (10) 1.54 (0.94–2.55) 1.61 (0.97–2.65) 291 20 (7) 2.44 (1.05–5.67) 2.40 (1.03–5.58)
 30 to <40% 271 59 (22) 3.38 (2.22–5.15) 3.37 (2.20–5.15) 242 29 (12) 4.74 (2.16–10.40) 4.39 (2.01–9.58)
 <30% 384 144 (38) 6.23 (4.25–9.13) 6.93 (4.69–10.24) 338 57 (17) 6.68 (3.35–13.29) 6.98 (3.49–13.96)
Primary cohort
 ≥50% 228 8 (4) 1.00 1.00 222 3 (1) 1.00 1.00
 40 to <50% 159 10 (6) 2.43 (0.91–6.53) 2.43 (0.90–6.54) 153 4 (3) 1.25 (0.19–8.41) 1.24 (0.18–8.36)
 30 to <40% 131 25 (19) 7.08 (3.09–16.23) 6.51 (2.82–15.02) 123 6 (5) 3.68 (1.00–13.47) 3.61 (0.98–13.21)
 <30% 208 64 (31) 11.29 (5.13–24.85) 11.16 (5.05–24.64) 200 23 (12) 7.35 (2.22–24.26) 7.24 (2.19–23.94)
Secondary cohort
 ≥50% 238 28 (12) 1.00 1.00 190 7 (4) 1.00 1.00
 40 to <50% 160 22 (14) 1.30 (0.73–2.31) 1.38 (0.77–2.45) 138 16 (12) 2.91 (1.05–8.02) 2.92 (1.05–8.08)
 30 to <40% 140 34 (24) 2.39 (1.43–3.97) 2.50 (1.50–4.17) 119 23 (19) 5.11 (1.91–13.65) 4.76 (1.79–12.68)
 <30% 176 80 (45) 4.95 (3.16–7.77) 5.72 (3.60–9.09) 138 34 (25) 6.93 (2.90–16.59) 6.78 (2.83–16.25)

Strata based on TIR averaged over the entire DCCT study period. HR, hazard ratio.

*From discrete Cox proportional hazards regression models. P value, computed using TIR as a time-dependent continuous variable, is <0.001 for each cohort. †From discrete Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by the ETDRS level of retinopathy at baseline and adjusted for the pre-DCCT glycemic exposure represented by the preexisting duration of diabetes separately for the primary and secondary cohorts. P value, computed using TIR as a time-dependent continuous variable, is <0.001 for each cohort. An additional model which included age and sex as covariates produced similar results.