Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 12;2019(12):CD012804. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012804.pub2

Comparison 1. Ustekinumab versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Failure to maintain clinical remission at 22 weeks 1 145 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.63, 1.02]
2 Failure to maintain clinical response at 22 weeks 1 145 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.53 [0.36, 0.79]
3 Failure to maintain clinical remission at 44 weeks 1 388 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.64, 0.91]
3.1 90 mg/8 weeks 1 193 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.56, 0.94]
3.2 90 mg/12 weeks 1 195 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.63, 1.03]
4 Failure to maintain clinical response at 44 weeks 1 388 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.60, 0.91]
4.1 90 mg/8 weeks 1 193 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.54, 0.99]
4.2 90 mg/12 weeks 1 195 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.56, 1.00]
5 Adverse events 2 541 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.87, 1.03]
6 Serious adverse events 2 541 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.48, 1.15]
7 Withdrawal due to adverse events 1 145 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.93 [0.59, 41.18]