1.10. Analysis.
Comparison 1 Integrated models of care versus standard care, Outcome 10 Substance use: 5. Avearage score (SATS, low = poor) (skewed data).
Substance use: 5. Avearage score (SATS, low = poor) (skewed data) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Intervention | Mean | SD | N |
6 months | ||||
Essock 2006 | Treatment | 3.3 | 1.60 | 93 |
Essock 2006 | Control | 3.3 | 1.50 | 83 |
12 months | ||||
Drake 1998a | Treatment | 3.99 | 1.60 | 105 |
Drake 1998a | Control | 4.10 | 1.59 | 98 |
Essock 2006 | Treatment | 3.80 | 1.70 | 87 |
Essock 2006 | Control | 3.40 | 1.50 | 84 |
18 months | ||||
Drake 1998a | Treatment | 4.19 | 1.77 | 105 |
Drake 1998a | Control | 4.32 | 1.75 | 98 |
Essock 2006 | Treatment | 4.00 | 1.90 | 88 |
Essock 2006 | Control | 3.90 | 1.80 | 84 |
24 months | ||||
Drake 1998a | Treatment | 4.50 | 1.76 | 105 |
Drake 1998a | Control | 4.51 | 1.73 | 98 |
Essock 2006 | Treatment | 4.20 | 2.0 | 79 |
Essock 2006 | Control | 3.7 | 1.90 | 83 |
30 months | ||||
Drake 1998a | Treatment | 4.76 | 1.92 | 105 |
Drake 1998a | Control | 4.48 | 1.88 | 98 |
Essock 2006 | Treatment | 4.10 | 2.0 | 80 |
Essock 2006 | Control | 4.0 | 1.9 | 75 |
36 months | ||||
Essock 2006 | Treatment | 4.40 | 1.80 | 78 |
Essock 2006 | Control | 4.30 | 2.10 | 79 |