Skip to main content
letter
. 2019 Oct 28;3(6):570–585. doi: 10.1002/evl3.146

Table 2.

Phylogenetic signal (Pagel's λ and associated chi‐square statistics and P‐values) of hybridization measures and potential predictors at different taxonomic levels

Family level Genus level
Trait N observed Pagel's λ Chi‐Square DF P‐value N observed Pagel's λ Chi‐Square DF P‐value
Hybridization propensity 195 0.30 32.31 1 0.000 1772 0.11 52.28 1 0.000
Hybrid ratio 195 0.14 8.06 1 0.005 1772 0.13 52.05 1 0.000
Perenniality 195 0.22 10.34 1 0.001 1754 0.47 314.01 1 0.000
Woodiness 195 0.47 40.87 1 0.000 1767 0.80 968.73 1 0.000
Percent agricultural 195 0.26 3.90 1 0.048 1772 1.00 6738.41 1 0.000
Outcrossing 76 0.01 0.01 1 0.943 158 0.24 3.72 1 0.054
Red List 138 0.00 ‐0.01 1 1.000 374 0.25 21.45 1 0.000
Floral symmetry 114 0.51 13.33 1 0.000 235 0.76 124.51 1 0.000
Pollination syndrome 164 0.79 70.89 1 0.000 878 0.93 1208.71 1 0.000
Breeding system 130 0.03 0.17 1 0.678 639 0.09 8.87 1 0.003
Reproductive system 133 0.32 18.48 1 0.000 655 0.46 135.09 1 0.000
C‐value 177 0.66 57.11 1 0.000 761 0.74 476.77 1 0.000
C.V. C‐value 144 0.37 7.04 1 0.008 522 0.00 –0.00 1 1.000