HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding
PE2, PE2 R110S K103L, Cas9 H840A nickase, or dCas9, together with a
HEK3-targeting pegRNA plasmid. Cell viability was
measured for the bulk cellular population every 24 hours post-transfection
for 3 days using the CellTiter-Glo 2.0 assay (Promega). (a)
Viability, as measured by luminescence, at 1, 2, or 3 days
post-transfection. Values and error bars reflect mean±s.e.m. of n=3
independent biological replicates, each performed in technical triplicate.
(b) Percent editing and indels for PE2, PE2 R110S K103L,
Cas9 H840A nickase, or dCas9, together with a
HEK3-targeting pegRNA plasmid that encodes a +5 G to A
edit. Editing efficiencies were measured on day 3 post-transfection from
cells treated alongside of those used for assaying viability in (a). Values
and error bars reflect mean±s.d. of n=3 independent biological
replicates. (c-k) Analysis of cellular RNA, depleted for
ribosomal RNA, isolated from HEK293T cells expressing PE2, PE2-dRT, or Cas9
H840A nickase and a PRNP-targeting or
HEXA-targeting pegRNA. RNAs corresponding to 14,410 genes
and 14,368 genes were detected in PRNP and
HEXA samples, respectively. (c-h) Volcano
plot displaying the −log10 FDR-adjusted p-value vs.
log2-fold change in transcript abundance for each RNA,
comparing (c) PE2 vs. pE2-dRT with
PRNP-targeting pegRNA, (d) PE2 vs. Cas9 H840A
with PRNP-targeting pegRNA, (e) PE2-dRT vs.
Cas9 H840A with PRNP-targeting pegRNA, (f) PE2
vs. PE2-dRT with HeXa-targeting pegRNA, (g)
PE2 vs. Cas9 H840A with HEXA-targeting pegRNA,
(h) PE2-dRT vs. Cas9 H840A with
HEXA-targeting pegRNA. Red dots indicate genes that show
≥2-fold change in relative abundance that are statistically
significant (FDR-adjusted p < 0.05).
(i-k) Venn diagrams of upregulated and downregulated
transcripts (≥2-fold change) comparing PRNP and
HEXA samples for (i) PE2 vs PE2-dRT,
(j) PE2 vs. Cas9 H840A, and (k) PE2-dRT vs.
Cas9 H840A. Values for each RNA-seq condition reflect the mean n=5
biological replicates. Differential expression was assessed using a
two-sided t-test with empirical Bayesian variance estimation.