Table 2.

Data collected for process evaluation

Aspects evaluated		Data collection method
1. Blended training: e-learning + interdisciplinary workshops
Implementation	Who (which HCP) participated in which aspects of the training (e-learning course and workshops)	(Qt) Automatic recording of participation on the e-learning platform—attendance form for workshops
Mechanism of impact	Satisfaction (according to levels 1 and 2 of the Kirkpatrick model)	(Qt) Satisfaction survey
	Perceived effect on ICCs (Qt)	(Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups
2. Local interdisciplinary meetings
Implementation	Number of LIM sessions, number and types of participants, duration, level of consensus reached, etc.)	(Qt) Form filled in by the CP or (head) nurse after each LC
Mechanism of impact	Experiences and opinions of participants, satisfaction, perceived benefits (e.g., impact on ICCs, impact on the use of the therapeutic formulary, etc.)	(Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups
Contextual factors	Factors influencing the implementation and the perceived impact of LIMs	(Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups
3. Interdisciplinary case conferences
Implementation	Number of ICCs, number and types of participants, duration, DRPs identified and discussed, etc.	(Qt) Electronic form filled in by the HCPs on the web application after each ICC
Mechanism of impact	Experiences and opinions of participants, satisfaction, perceived benefits (e.g., impact on medication use, on NHRs, etc.)	(Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups
Contextual factors	Factors influencing the implementation and the perceived impact of ICCs Views on implementation on a larger scale in Belgium	(Ql) Multidisciplinary focus groups

CP: coordinating physician, DRP: drug-related problem, HCPs: healthcare professionals, ICCs: interdisciplinary case conferences, LIMs: local interdisciplinary meetings, NHs: nursing homes, NHRs: nursing home residents, Ql: qualitative data, Qt: quantitative data