Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 12;9:18959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55282-9

Table 1.

Data quality of the three sequencing runs.

Chip ID Sample number Final reads TF alignment Reads passed length filteringa Barcode and primer sortingb Downstream barcode identificationc Matched reads Reads of each sample (mean ± std.dev) Reads of per locus per sample(mean ± std.dev) Reads of per locus per sample Sample% reported more than 15 loci
1 150 4.4 M 95% 4.27 M 4.0 M 3.7 M 3.6 M 24,053 ± 24,318 1,503 ± 1,520 352~4,466 94%
2 151 4.4 M 97% 4.24 M 4.1 M 3.7 M 3.7 M 24,244 ± 26,667 1,515 ± 1,667 381~4,018 95%
3 150 4.3 M 96% 4.08 M 3.9 M 2.5 M 2.4 M 15,712 ± 14,271 982 ± 892 183~2,311 97%
4 150 3.6 M 94% 3.47 M 3.2 M 2.9 M 2.9 M 19,273 ± 18,228 1,205 ± 1,139 283~3,214 93%
Average 150 4.2 M 95.5% 4.02 M 3.8 M 3.2 M 3.1 M 20,826 ± 21,689 1,301 ± 1,355 359~3,503 94.8%

aLength filtering was performed by giving up the reads less than 60 bp.

bBarcode and primer sorting was processed by perfect matching to barcode (10 bp) and forward primer sequences (19–23 bp).

cDownstream barcodes were specifically chosen sequences (5–10 bp) downstream of the short tandem repeat (STR) repeat region. Detection of this downstream barcode may help to obtain reads that cover the entire STR repeat region. Perfect matching was applied in this filtering step.