Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 12;10:5683. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13286-z

Table 2.

Cox-regression analysis of progression-free (a) and disease-specific (b) survival with genomic clustering.

Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
(a) Progression-free survival
 Primary tumor site
   Trunk (vs Extremity)a 5.22 (2.08–13.10) 4.29 × 10−4** 4.29 (1.59–11.58) 4.01 × 10−3**
 Surgical margin
   (R2, R1, R0) 2.25 (1.33–3.81) 2.52 × 10−3** 1.62 (0.87–3.01) 0.131
 Genomic cluster
   Cluster 1 (vs 2) 1.82 (1.08–3.04) 0.0234* 2.31 (1.33–4.00) 2.84 × 10−3**
   Cluster 3 (vs 2) 0.399 (0.55–2.92) 0.365 1.12 (0.14–8.85) 0.912
(b) Disease-specific survival
 Primary tumor site
   Trunk (vs Extremity)a 8.14 (1.10–60.06) 0.0397* 5.93 (0.76–46.21) 0.0894
 Surgical margin
   (R2, R1, R0) 2.70 (1.16–6.26) 0.0207* 2.23 (0.84–5.86) 0.106
 Genomic cluster
   Cluster 1 (vs 2) 2.86 (1.28–6.39) 0.0104* 3.18 (1.35–7.48) 8.07 × 10−3**
   Cluster 3 (vs 2) 1.38 × 10−8 (0–Inf) 0.999 1.55 × 10−7 (0–Inf) 0.998

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio

The results are presented for the univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis for progression-free and disease-specific survival, using clinical measures and genomic cluster. Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to the SCNA regions are shown in Fig. 3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

aTrunk includes abdomen, retroperitoneum, chest wall, and back, and extremity includes extremity, shoulder, and girdle