Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;20(12):87–96. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12767

Table 4.

Comparing plan parameters and plan quality between auto plan and clinical plan for case #1.

  Clinical plan Auto plan
Prescription 2.67 Gy × 15
Energy 10X 10X
Gantry (medial beam)/° 309 311
Collimator (medial beam)/° 12 8
X1 (posterior jaw)/cm 4.5 4.5
Y1 (inferior jaw)/cm 9 9.5
Y2 (superior jaw)/cm 12 11
Plan MU 312 332
PTVeval_Breast V95/% 93.5 93.3
PTVeval_Lumpectomy V95/% 95.7 96.4
PTVeval_Breast V105/% 17.7 4.7
Lt Lung V20/% 14.7 12.1
Heart Dmean/Gy 1.0 0.8