Table 7.
Comparison of the auto plan using auto contours with the auto plan using clinical contours.
| Auto plan w auto contours | Auto plan w clinical contours | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 10X | 10X | |
| Gantry/° | 313 | 311 | |
| Collimator/° | 10 | 8 | |
| X1 (posterior jaw)/cm | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Y1 (inferior jaw)/cm | 9.7 | 9.5 | |
| Y2 (superior jaw)/cm | 11.6 | 11 | |
| Plan MU | 326 | 332 | |
| Dice coefficient of 90% IDL | 0.94 | ||
| Dice coefficient of 50% IDL | 0.95 | ||
| Plan quality | DVH to auto contours | DVH to clinical contours | DVH to clinical Contours |
| PTVeval_Breast V95/% | 85.8 | 92.7 | 93.3 |
| PTVeval_Lumpectomy V95/% | 97.1 | 97.4 | 96.4 |
| PTVeval_Breast V105/% | 6.1 | 5.6 | 4.7 |
| Lt Lung V20/% | 12.3 | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Heart Dmean/Gy | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 |