Table 3.
Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Results | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Representativeness of the sample | Sample size | Non-respondents | Ascertainment of the exposure (risk factor): | Comparability of subjects in different outcome groups on the basis of design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | Statistical test | ||
Garvin and Sledge [6] | * | * | * | * | * | 5/10 | ||
Pennington et al. [7] | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6/10 | |
Garbin et al. [5] | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | 8/10 | |
Steadman et al. [13] | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | 8/10 | |
Azodo et al. [1] | * | * | * | * | * | 5/10 | ||
Premadasa et al. [14] | * | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | 9/10 |
McCombs et al. [15] | * | * | * | ** | * | 6/10 | ||
Ullah et al. [16] | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | 8/10 |
Scale of studies (points): Very Good: 9–10, Good: 7–8, Satisfactory: 5–6, and Unsatisfactory: 0 to 4