Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 12;20:976. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6358-x

Table 2.

Number of proteins that showed increased expression (fold change) under each condition compared to sucrose control

Genome Number of proteins with fold change > 0 under any condition compared to sucrose
(% of total CDS)
Number of proteins with fold change > 0 when grown in chitin vs sucrose
(% of total CDS)
Number of proteins with fold change > 0 when grown in grass vs sucrose
(% of total CDS)
Number of proteins with fold change > 0 when grown in pine vs sucrose
(% of total CDS)
Number of proteins with fold change > 0 under all three conditions compared to sucrose
(% of total CDS)
Aspergillus CK392 (FGC_1) 315(3.6%) 104(1.2%) 101(1.2%) 110(1.3%) 72(0.8%)
Coniochaeta CK134 (FGC_2) 2275(21.4%) 809(7.6%) 876(8.2%) 590(5.6%) 481(4.5%)
Embellisia CK46 (FGC_3) 1504(12.5%) 631(5.2%) 347(2.9%) 526(4.4%) 246(2.0%)
Chaetomium CK152 (FGC_4) 2306(19.5%) 1050(8.9%) 731(6.2%) 5254.5%) 398(3.4%)
Phoma CK108 (FGC_5) 975(9.5%) 307(3.0%) 318(3.1%) 350(3.4%) 148(1.5%)

Data for this table were compiled from Additional file 3. CDS: coding sequences