Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226518

Table 4. Outcomes by priority compared with hypothetical dispatch prioritization.

Type Priority N Emergent transport,
percent
Ambulance intervention,
percent
NEWS value,
mean
Admitted, percent Critical care,
percent
2-day mortality,
percent
Current 1A 473 35.3
(31.3–39.7)
87.5
(84.6–90.5)
5.64
(5.28–6.02)
48.6
(44.2–52.9)
14.6
(11.6–17.8)
4.7
(3.0–6.6)
1B 5657 22.5
(21.4–23.6)
86.4
(85.5–87.2)
3.70
(3.59–3.80)
52.3
(51.0–53.6)
6.5
(5.9–7.2)
1.7
(1.4–2.0)
2A 6112 3.4
(3.0–3.9)
70.5
(69.3–71.6)
2.81
(2.74–2.89)
51.5
(50.1–52.8)
4.7
(4.2–5.2)
0.6
(0.4–0.9)
2B 1353 1.7
(1.1–2.4)
60.5
(57.9–63.2)
2.33
(2.20–2.46)
47.7
(44.8–50.5)
4.4
(3.3–5.4)
0.4
(0.1–0.9)
Hypo-thetical 1A 473 37.8
(33.4–42.5)
90.7
(87.9–93.2)
7.22
(6.84–7.61)
75.3
(71.2–79.1)
22.2
(18.4–25.8)
10.1
(7.4–12.9)
1B 5657 15.3
(14.3–16.2)
77.9
(76.8–79.0)
4.22
(4.13–4.33)
69.6
(68.5–70.8)
8.2
(7.5–8.9)
1.6
(1.2–1.9)
2A 6112 8.9
(8.1–9.7)
74.9
(73.8–76.0)
2.37
(2.31–2.44)
40.3
(39.0–41.5)
3.3
(2.8–3.7)
0.4
(0.3–0.6)
2B 1353 6.1
(4.9–7.3)
75.0
(72.7–77.2)
1.55
(1.45–1.65)
16.3
(14.3–18.4)
1.0
(0.5–1.6)
0.0
(0.0–0.0)

Table presents a comparison of outcome prevalences within each priority group as dispatched per current clinical practice, and for a hypothetical situation in which calls were dispatched based solely on the proposed dispatch risk score. All estimates are reported with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals.