Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Mar 12;139(9):1860–1866.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.01.034

Table 3:

Analysis of serum IgE antibodies.

BP180 IgE2 BP230 IgE2 Total IgE3
Comparison1 Mean Ratiod
95% CI
p-value Mean Ratio
95% CI
p-value Mean Ratio
95% CI
p-value
ND+BP vs. BP CON 0.760
0.504-1.139
0.1801 1.195
0.934-1.530
0.1540 0.889
0.443-1.787
0.7383
PD+BP vs. BP CON 0.581
0.325-1.038
0.0661 0.944
0.665-1.340
0.7429 0.290
0.107-0.787
0.0159
DEM+BP vs. BP CON 1.135
0.617-2.089
0.6789 1.084
0.774-1.519
0.6331 0.778
0.297-2.035
0.6040
STR+ BP vs. BP CON 0.586
0.318-1.077
0.0804 1.663
1.132-2.443
0.0100 1.792
0.598-5.372
0.2933
PD+BP vs. STR+BP 0.992
0.458-2.150
0.9844 0.568
0.353-0.914
0.0205 0.162
0.041-0.631
0.0094
DEM+BP vs. STR+BP 1.939
0.875-4.296
0.1013 0.652
0.409-1.040
0.0720 0.434
0.114-1.648
0.2164
PD+BP vs. DEM+BP 0.512
0.236-1.109
0.0884 0.870
0.561-1.350
0.5299 0.372
0.106-1.306
0.1209
1

Subjects included BP controls (BP CON), and BP patients with preceding neurologic disease (ND); Parkinson’s disease (PD+BP), dementia (DEM+BP), stroke (STR+BP)

2

IgE autoantibodies specific for BP180 and BP230 were measured by ELISA.

3

Total IgE was measured electrochemiluminescence.

4

Mean ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-value are indicated for each comparison. A p-value <0.0071 was considered significant.