Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;9:19102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55617-6

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Binding of HIPP1 protein to genomic sites in pupae from transgenic lines expressing full-length Su(Hw)+, Su(Hw)Δ283, and Su(Hw)Δ114. (a) SBS-CM sites; (b) SBS-C sites; (c) SBS-O sites; (d) CP190 alone sites. Su(Hw) refers to the y2 w1118; su(Hw)v/su(Hw)e04061 background. The different variants of the Su(Hw) protein were expressed in the y2scD1ct6; P{Su(Hw)}-38D/P{Su(Hw)}-38D; su(Hw)v/su(Hw)e04061 lines, where P{Su(Hw)} are Su(Hw)+ − P{w+; UbqW-Su(Hw)1-945-FLAG}; Su(Hw)Δ114 − P{w+; UbqW-Su(Hw)1-88/202-945-FLAG}; Su(Hw)Δ283 − P{w+; UbqW-Su(Hw)1-760/778-945-FLAG}. The ras64B coding region (ras) was used as a control devoid of Su(Hw) binding sites. The percent recovery of immunoprecipitated DNA (Y-axis) was calculated relative to the amount of input DNA. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three independent biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significance levels (Student’s t-test) of *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, or ***p < 0.001. P values are not displayed for significance >0.05. Significance levels are shown for treatment comparisons indicated by horizontal brackets (here and in Figs. 46). ChIP was performed with antibodies against HIPP1. Statistical analysis was performed relative to the Su(Hw)+ variant.