Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;9:19102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55617-6

Figure 6.

Figure 6

HIPP1 and Mod(mdg4)-67.2 did not affect Su(Hw)-dependent repression in ovaries. (a) ChIP-qPCR data showing HIPP1 binding to model promoters in the wild type (wt) and HippΔ1 pupae. ChIP was performed with antibodies against HIPP1. IgG refers to nonspecific immunoglobulins. Statistical analysis was performed relative to the wild type condition. Other designations are as described in Fig. 2. (b) RT-qPCR data showing the expression of model genes in the ovaries of wt and mutant females. Expression levels are shown as the fold-change relative to wt levels. Error bars indicate standard deviations of two independent biological replicates. The lines used in this analysis are designated as described in Fig. 4.