Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct;7(4):366–372. doi: 10.29252/beat-070405

Table 2.

Effects on circular excision wound contraction area (mm2). Values are given as mean ± SEM

Wound area on days (mm 2 )
Groups 6 9 12 15 18 21
Group I 230.10±4.90 101.33±5.10 83.75±3.63 40.78±3.30 25.20±2.13 7.83±3.34
Group II 245.10±4.60 211.11±4.10 181.17±3.23 147.70±3.93 97.60±3.41 74.10±3.75
Group III 222.25±4.12 190.73±4.77 170.89±3.24 126.50±2.10 70.65±2.18 60.38±2.85
Group IV 221.21±4.13 191.55±4.50 175.30±3.13 126.50±3.45 73.10±2.10 66.60±2.23
Group V 110.10±3.17 a 70.67±2.10 a 31.75±2.30 a 13.37±1.58 a 4.55±0.75 a 0.00±0.00 a

The treated groups are compared by Student t test with other groups. a: The mean difference was significant at the .05 level vs. groups III and IV.