Table 2.
Effects on circular excision wound contraction area (mm2). Values are given as mean ± SEM
|
Wound area on days (mm
2
)
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 |
| Group I | 230.10±4.90 | 101.33±5.10 | 83.75±3.63 | 40.78±3.30 | 25.20±2.13 | 7.83±3.34 |
| Group II | 245.10±4.60 | 211.11±4.10 | 181.17±3.23 | 147.70±3.93 | 97.60±3.41 | 74.10±3.75 |
| Group III | 222.25±4.12 | 190.73±4.77 | 170.89±3.24 | 126.50±2.10 | 70.65±2.18 | 60.38±2.85 |
| Group IV | 221.21±4.13 | 191.55±4.50 | 175.30±3.13 | 126.50±3.45 | 73.10±2.10 | 66.60±2.23 |
| Group V | 110.10±3.17 a | 70.67±2.10 a | 31.75±2.30 a | 13.37±1.58 a | 4.55±0.75 a | 0.00±0.00 a |
The treated groups are compared by Student t test with other groups. a: The mean difference was significant at the .05 level vs. groups III and IV.