Table 1.
Study (Listed in Alphabetical Order) | Strategy to Target DA-Glutamate Co-Release | Test | Effect |
---|---|---|---|
Alsiö et al., 2011 [61] | Vglut2f/f;DAT-Cre | Sucrose preference | lower threshold |
Sucrose self-administration | ↑ responding under food restriction | ||
↑ consumption when fed ad libitum | |||
Cocaine self-administration | ↑ for lower doses | ||
↑ responding for cocaine-associated cues | |||
Birgner et al., 2010 [54] | Vglut2f/f;DAT-Cre | Rotarod (crude motor coordination) | − |
Beam walking (fine motor coordination) | − | ||
Elevated plus maze (anxiety) | ↑ latency to move | ||
Multi-variate concentric square field (anxiety and risk analysis) | ↑ risk-taking behavior | ||
Forced swim test (depression) | − | ||
Radial maze | − | ||
Acute amphetamine | dose-dependent alterations | ||
Fortin et al., 2012 [62] | Vglut2f/f;DAT-Cre | Rotarod (crude motor coordination) | ↓ motor performance |
Forced swim test (depression) | ↓ latency to immobility | ||
Spontaneous activity in novel environment | ↓ horizontal activity | ||
Acute amphetamine | ↓ locomotor responses | ||
Acute cocaine | ↓ locomotor responses | ||
Hnasko et al., 2010 [63] | Vglut2f/f;DAT-Cre | Spontaneous locomotion | − |
Rotarod (crude motor coordination) | − | ||
Acute cocaine | ↓ locomotor responses | ||
Cocaine sensitization | − | ||
Cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) | − | ||
Mingote et al., 2017 [64] | DATIREScre/+::GLS1lox/+ | Rotarod (crude motor coordination) | − |
Novelty induced locomotion | − | ||
Elevated plus maze (anxiety) | − | ||
Fear conditioning | − | ||
Acute amphetamine | − | ||
Amphetamine sensitization | ↓ | ||
Latent inhibition | ↑ | ||
Papathanou et al., 2018 [24] | Vglut2f/f;DAT-CreERT2 | Amphetamine and cocaine sensitization | − (baseline AMPA/NMDA ratio altered) |
Wang et al., 2017 [65] | Vglut2f/f;DAT-Cre | RT-PP (optogenetics in VTA) | − |
Self-stimulation (optogenetics in VTA) | no effects on acquisition ↓ responses in higher laser power stimulation |