Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 15;8(11):1998. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111998

Table 3.

Results of the sensitivity analysis. (Studies with MINORS score below 12 were excluded from the pooled analysis).

Comparison Original Analysis Number of Studies Refs Mean Difference
[95% CI]
Statistical Method Statistical Model Hetero-Geneity
SF-12 PCS pooled analysis of non-union versus normal population. Figure 3 3 [19,22,23] −19.30
[−22.27, −16.33]
Inverse Variance (IV) Random effects I2 = 92%
SF-12 MCS pooled analysis between non-union and respective normal population. Figure 4 3 [19,22,23] −6.98
[−8.57, −5.40]
IV Random effects I2 = 52%
SF-12 PCS pooled analysis between nonunion and union. Figure 5 2 [19,23] −5.75
[−7.50, −4.0]
IV Fixed effects I2 = 0
SF-12 MCS pooled analysis between nonunion and union. Figure 6 2 [19,23] −3.98
[−6.26, −1.70]
IV Fixed effects I2 = 0